A first amendment junkie essayssusan jacoby's, a first amendment junkie, is an extremely well written and sound argument in which readers can clearly understand the purpose from the title, a first amendment junkie, she gets the readers attention and even force. Rather, in “a first amendment junkie” author susan jacoby makes the argumentative statement that there is an alternate position that allows one to simultaneously condemn pornography and to safeguard the protections of expression assured americans by the first amendment i agree with jacoby’s position.
A “first amendment junkie” many feminist arguments for controls on pornography carry the implicit conviction that porn books, magazines, and moves pose a greater threat to women than. Thesis statement argumentative compare and contrast scroll to top home an analysis of a first amendment junkie, an essay by susan jacoby pages 3 words 596 view full essay more essays like this: susan jacoby, a first amendment junkie not sure what i'd do without @kibin susan jacoby, a first amendment junkie not sure what i'd do.
In her 1978 essay, “a first amendment junkie, susan jacoby argues for an “absolute interpretation of the first amendment, even in cases of controversial forms of expression, such as pornography. “a first amendment junkie” (our title) appeared in the hers column in the new york times in 1978 it is no news that many women are defecting from the ranks of civil libertarians.
A first amendment junkie in susan jacoby’s essay a first amendment junkie, what she means by saying that she is a first amendment junkie is that she believes totally in the 1st amendment the author believes in an absolute and complete interpretation of the 1st amendment.
- the first amendment is the first section of the bill of rights and is often considered the most important part of the us constitution because it guarantees the citizens of united states the essential personal freedoms of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly and the freedom to petition the government. In a first amendment junkie by new york times author susan jacoby, she argues that censoring pornography goes against the first amendment she believes that the first amendment should be absolutely interpreted she states that people will never be able to agree on what should be censored.
It is clear as early as the end of the first paragraph jacoby’s thesis or major claim- that censorship of any form is wrong at the beginning of the second paragraph she states her belief, “ in an absolute interpretation of the first amendment, ” from which comes the idea of a “ first amendment junkie. A female for the first although a very respected female journalist, susan jacoby was labeled as a first amendment junkie by many other women for her personal views concerning the censorship of pornography in society.